Re: [docbook-apps] Re: including non-xml

On 04/29/10 10:26, Ivan Ristic wrote:
> That I can do, but I usually only use code fragments in my books, 
> whereas complete examples usually have a lot more stuff.

Ok.

That's a valid point.

> I think that would be very difficult to pull off in a useful way, 
> mostly because it would prevent me from using an IDE.

???

I guess I should ask, what language?

Does the language / IDE not have the ability to include code from other 
files?

I guess I'm too used to working in modular <everything> to remember 
monolithic source.  (Comment on my shortcoming, not yours.)



Grant. . . .