>>>>> Dave Pawson writes:
>> > From the above, you can see that the html header from docbook is all
>> > redundant?
>>
>> Not from the above,
>> but if I want to keep the article separate, then yes.
> I'm unsure what an atom feed reader would do with a link to docbook
> source in the body. Try it?
Hmm, Dave, *come* *on*!! Pls!
I mean, of course the link points to HTML content, not to literal
DocBook content.
Have a look at this feed e.g.:
http://pragprog.com/feed/global
Minimal content for each atom feed entry (or is it RSS?!?),
just a pointer to the content, which is separate.
By now I am also aware of "Norm's Own Approach",
pointed to by Maurith, see below!
I assume, that's DocBook articles with the feed refering to the HTML content generated from DocBook.
Whether it really is like that with Norm's Own Approach or not,
I would like it like that,
and that's where I would like to get.
>> Separate articles, each written in DocBook, atom being the wrapper
>> pointing to articles living for themselves, one by one.
> Hand craft a feed and see what bloglines or something does with it
> before you go further.
> HTH
> regards
> Dave Pawson
> XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
> http://www.dpawson.co.uk
Thanks for your patience and for your offer as well!
J.
>>>>> "MJ" == Mauritz Jeanson <> writes:
MJ> Norman Walsh writes his blog in (a customization of) DocBook:
MJ> http://norman.walsh.name/
MJ> Here is an old (obsolete?) article describing the machinery:
MJ> http://norman.walsh.name/2003/05/14/how
MJ> Mauritz
