I wonder if anyone is using b and i in selectors in CSS? Such selectors would have to
be enhanced to include the new element names.
Bob Stayton
Sagehill Enterprises
----- Original Message -----
From: "Keith Fahlgren" <>
To: "DocBook Apps ML" <>
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 2:02 PM
Subject: [docbook-apps] Re: Including <b> and <i> in XHTML stylesheets
> Leaving aside the issue of the highlighting stylesheets, here are the
> uses of <i> in the html/ stylesheets:
>
> biblio-iso690.xsl:3
> biblio.xsl:3
> component.xsl:1
> division.xsl:1
> synop.xsl:1
> xref.xsl:1
>
> simlarly, <b>:
> autotoc.xsl:2
> block.xsl:10
> ebnf.xsl:1
> formal.xsl:1
> lists.xsl:1
> qandaset.xsl:3
> refentry.xsl:1
> titlepage.xsl:2
>
>
> Looking at every single instance above, I don't see a single one that
> should remain a <b> or <i> instead of being either removed or changed
> to <strong> or <em>. Does anyone want to argue why <b> and <i> should
> be preserved for 1.76.1?
>
>
>
>
> Thanks,
> Keith
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> For additional commands, e-mail:
>
>
>
