>from a marketing point of view
I am not sure what the "correct answer" is; however, lets ask
Who is the intended audiance / market of DocBook ?
-----Original Message-----
From: Jochen Hayek [mailto:]
Sent: Sunday, August 15, 2010 12:10 PM
To:
Subject: [docbook-apps] Re: html 5, as a target
>>>>> Jirka Kosek writes:
> Dave Pawson wrote:
>> Structural markup would better match docbook semantics.
> You mean those new elements which are not working in IE6 & IE7?
> http://blog.whatwg.org/supporting-new-elements-in-ie
>> Generally a move forward from html 4.
> From markup point of view HTML5 is a mess. No grammar, no schema. HTML5
> is step forward for web applications, but in some other directions it is
> step backward.
We all appreciate your technical expertise,
but from a marketing point of view,
it's one of the biggest mistakes you or the DocBook community could make,
if you said: we ignore HTML5.
Would you agree?
Jochen, the rough+rude Hun ;-)
P.S.
Me being a stubborn Darwinist, ;-)
I can only emphasize, that "evolution is not always to the better".
But it's sort of stupid to fight evolution,
better join it, if that matters to evolution.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:
