Next in thread → Next in month →

Re: [docbook-apps] Are HTML chunk targets equivalent to XHTML chunk targets for olinking?

From
Bob Stayton <>
Date
2011-02-25T18:44:08+00:00
ID
061f01cbd51b$f46b7f30$6600a8c0@pazu
Thread
Re: [docbook-apps] Are HTML chunk targets equivalent to XHTML chunk targets for olinking?
Hi Peter,

I don't recommend mixing HTML and XHTML stylesheets 
because of potential namespace problems. For example, a <xreftext> element 
in the target data could be populated with a title that includes HTML elements 
such as <i> or <span> from styling in inline element in the 
title.  When you generate the target data using the HTML stylesheets, those 
inline HTML elements are not in a namespace.  But when you process your 
document with the XHTML stylesheets, all the output is in the XHTML namespace 
*except* those HTML elements from the target data, which will acquire a xmlns="" 
attribute to indicate their null namespace.  I'm not sure what webhelp will 
think of this mixing of namespaced and non-namespaced HTML 
elements.

 

It is possible to get the XHTML stylesheet working 
with olinks.  I'm curious about the "Invalid byte" error, which sounds like 
an encoding mismatch somewhere.

 

 

Bob Stayton
Sagehill Enterprises


 

 

  
----- Original Message ----- 

  
From: 
  Peter Desjardins 

  
To: DocBook Apps 

  
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2011 9:39 
  AM

  
Subject: [docbook-apps] Are HTML chunk 
  targets equivalent to XHTML chunk targets for olinking?

  

Hi. I'm generating webhelp output with Saxon and Xerces and I 
  ran into a problem generating targets for olinks. I process my source document 
  twice, once to generate the target database and then to produce the actual 
  output. When I use the xhtml/chunk.xsl stylesheet to generate targets, the 
  target database file includes a doctype declaration and problematic 
  characters.

I see this has been discussed before and I tried just 
  stripping out the doctype declaration as described here:

  http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg10288.html

That 
  stopped Saxon from complaining about the doctype in the target database but 
  then it complained about some of the characters. I think they were quotation 
  marks and apostrophes.

  [java] Olink error: could not open target 
  database 'olink-map.xml'.
  [java] Error: unresolved olink: 
  targetdoc/targetptr = 'foo/bar'.
  [java] Error on line 4 column 878 
  of file:/C:/targets.db:
  [java]   Error reported by XML 
  parser: Invalid byte 3 of 3-byte UTF-8 sequence.

I decided to try to 
  avoid generating the target database using the XHTML stylesheets and use the 
  HTML stylesheet instead. I set up two stylesheets in my customization layer. 
  One imports the HTML stylesheet for generating targets and the other imports 
  the XHTML stylesheet for generating the actual webhelp output. Here are the 
  two stylesheets. I had to strip out the <xsl:import> from webhelp.xsl to 
  make this work.

<xsl:stylesheet version="1.0" xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform">
  
  <xsl:import href="http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/xsl-ns/current/html/chunk.xsl" 
  />
  <xsl:import href="../webhelp-ns/xsl/webhelp.xsl" 
  />
  <xsl:import href="my-webhelp-customizations.xsl" 
  />
</xsl:stylesheet>

<xsl:stylesheet version="1.0" 
  xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform">
  
  <xsl:import href="http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/xsl-ns/current/xhtml/chunk.xsl" 
  />
  <xsl:import href="../webhelp-ns/xsl/webhelp.xsl" 
  />
  <xsl:import href="my-webhelp-customizations.xsl" 
  />
</xsl:stylesheet>

There should not be any meaningful 
  difference between the chunking and styling for the targets and for the actual 
  output, right? I'm wondering whether I'm introducing inconsistency between the 
  link targets and the actual content that the links will try to point 
  to.

Thanks.

Peter Desjardins
Next in thread → Next in month →