Sorry. I mean that IEEE has a particular visual appearance. It doesn't
look unusual, and I believe the stock XSL:FO are up to the task.
I'm just very surprised to not see someone publishing a drop-in settings
file that cranks out IEEE layout. Figured I should check if there's a
reason. Hate to go barking down the wrong path.
Dave Pawson wrote:
> On Mon, 09 May 2011 10:27:07 -0700
> David Priest<> wrote:
>
>> A bit of googling turns up a dearth of information about rendering
>> IEEE-compliant technical publications. This quite surprises me.
>>
>> Are the XSL:FO standard transformations easily IEEE-compliant?
>
> For what definition of IEEE compliant David? That sounds really odd
> to me, that a transform should be compliant to ... something?
>
>
>> Looking at one of their PDFs there does not seem to be anything
>> particularly special or tricksy with their layout.
>
>
> Or do you mean the PDF needs to be 'special' in some way?
>
>
>
>
>
