Next in thread → Next in month →

RE: [docbook-apps] FW: Microsoft Help v1.0 transform

From
Jeff Powanda <>
Date
2013-03-09T02:30:26+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [docbook-apps] FW: Microsoft Help v1.0 transform
Sure, I would be interested in
Microsoft Help Viewer 1.x support since we’ll need to move away from CHM
files eventually. Should be straightforward as I understand the Help Viewer 1.x
topic files are standard XHTML files that are simply zipped into an MSHC file. 

 

Regards,

Jeff Powanda



Vocera Communications, Inc.

 

From: Bob Stayton
[mailto:] 

Sent: Friday, March 08, 2013 10:22 AM

To: Olsen, Morten Engelhardt; 

Subject: Re: [docbook-apps] FW: Microsoft Help v1.0 transform

 

Hi
Morten,

I
saw your message and before responding I was waiting to see if there was any
interest expressed by other members of the mailing list.  Given the number
of output formats we already support, we have to be careful about adding more.

 

So,
other members, is there a demand for converting DocBook to the new Microsoft
Help format?

 

I'm
not familiar with the new Microsoft Help format, but I would be willing to take
a look at your customization. 

 

Bob
Stayton

Sagehill Enterprises



 

From: Olsen, Morten Engelhardt 

Sent: Friday,
March 08, 2013 1:43 AM

To: 

Subject:
[docbook-apps] FW: Microsoft Help v1.0 transform

 

 

 

:: Morten Engelhardt Olsen

From: Olsen, Morten Engelhardt

Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 09:02

To: 

Subject: FW: Microsoft Help v1.0 transform

 

 

:: Morten Engelhardt Olsen

From: Olsen, Morten Engelhardt

Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 14:56

To: 

Subject: Microsoft Help v1.0 transform

Hi all,

 

I’m a long time reader and
no-poster (due to a super firewall here), but it should go through now.

 

Now, the the point;

 

I do remember to have seen
somewhere that there is a wish to get the new Microsoft Help format (hv1,hv2.0
etc) into docbook. We have written a transformation for this internally, and I
was wondering if it would  be something that upstream would be interested
in. If some of you think it will, then I would be happy to start the internal
(..yes) process of open sourcing the customizations.

 

It is functional, but there are
some corner cases that I know about that fails, so I believe it would be
preferable to get some more eyes on the transformation.

 

Please let me know what you think
regarding this

 

Morten Engelhardt Olsen

Software Engineer / Tools Group
/ Atmel Corporation

Tel: (+47) 930 94 593 


/ http://www.atmel.com/

 

The information contained in
this email message may be privileged, confidential and/or protected from
unauthorized disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, any
dissemination, distribution or copying is strictly prohibited. Please
immediately notify the sender by reply if you received this email in error.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Next in thread → Next in month →