Hi,
On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 10:00:48 -0700
"Bob Stayton" <> wrote:
> [...]
> I think you are understanding it correctly, and this seems to be a
> deficiency. I agree that the "xref-to-suffix" and "xref-to-prefix"
> modes should get the referrer element as a param, as well as
> xrefstyle like "xref-to" does.
Ok, I've submitted the change to r9805. Now, the "xref-to-suffix" and
"xref-to-prefix" modes have the same signature than "xref-to". I think,
this should solve the referrer issue. Please check if this is
correct. :)
However, the problem with the TOC still persists. Can this be avoided
somehow?
Thanks!
--
Gruß/Regards,
Thomas Schraitle
