Next in thread →
Next in month →
Re: [docbook-publishers] slight problem with publishers.rnc
//Folks, here's an update on the publishers.rnc. I figured out the error message (forgot the element decl for linegroup!). In my example content, there are some stage directions within the dialogue. As such, I think we should allow para in dialogue. Are there others that should be allowed? Is there a better pattern that we should allow (db.all.blocks or db.para.blocks, perhaps?) Best regards, --Scott Scott Hudson wrote: > Folks, > > still running into some issues with the RNC. Please find the RNC and > content sample attached. I'm getting the following errors: > Location: 709:24 > Description: unfinished element "dialogue": "((mediaobject | (line)+ | > line))+" required to finish the element > > Location: 711:36 > Description: unknown element "linegroup" from namespace > "http://docbook.org/ns/docbook" > > --Scott > > * Scott Hudson* > / Senior XML Architect/ > > > <mailto:> > > > > O: 303.542.2146 > > C: 303.332.1883 > > F: 303.544.0522 > > > > www.FlatironsSolutions.com <http://www.flatironssolutions.com/> > > / An Inc. 500 Company/ > > / / > > > > Dave Pawson wrote: > >> 2008/5/22 Scott Hudson <>: >> >> >>> Ahem. Looks like we forgot to define where dialogue and poetry should be >>> allowed! Try to validate the attached sample and you get: >>> unknown element "dialogue" from namespace "http://docbook.org/ns/docbook" >>> >>> Suggestions? >>> >>> >> Anywhere where a 'major' block can go. Should be as a sibling to the >> list elements? >> Para won't do, since I can put a para in a list, table cell etc. >> >> db.nopara.blocks would be right... except it's included in db.para (yuk) >> db.all.blocks perhaps >> or db.formal.blocks (are they the same class as the 'formal' set? Both >> can have titles) >> >> regards >> >> >> -- >> Dave Pawson >> XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. >> http://www.dpawson.co.uk >> >>
Next in thread →
Next in month →