Re: Change processing expectations of ulink?

From
Norman Walsh <>
Date
2000-07-25T20:25:45+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: Change processing expectations of ulink?
/ Eduardo Gutentag <> was heard to say:
| Actually, I interpreted it as meaning "EMPTY", as in <!ELEMENT foo
| EMPTY>, with the two last cases at the discretion of the stylesheet
| writer... ;-)

Ack! We can't make ulink EMPTY,
<ulink url="mailto:">Eduardo</ulink>.

Actually, that's probably going to come across as evidence *for*
rather than *against* making it empty, isn't it :-)

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <>      | It'll cost you.
http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | 
Chair, DocBook Technical Committee |