Norman Walsh <> writes:
> Proposed: Resolve RFE 440667 (Affiliation lacks CorpName) per the
> published proposal[1]. Please respond YEA or NAY to
> before Tuesday, 26 Feb 2002 at 05:00p
> EST (02:00p PST, 22:00GMT, 23:00BST, 00:00CEST+, 07:00JST+).
>
> Be seeing you,
> norm
>
> [1] http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=9351&group_id=21935
I vote YEA for removing corpname.
But I have a some questions about the additional attributes:
classname (corporation|nonprofit|informal|other) #IMPLIED
otherclass CDATA #IMPLIED
1. Why "classname" and not just "class"?
2. What's "otherclass" for?
3. Would it be worthwhile to add "consortium" to the enumerated list
of values for classname? (for marking up consortium names like
OASIS and W3C/World Wide Web Consortium)
--Mike
