That was also my understanding.
Larry Rowland
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Norman Walsh [mailto:]
> Sent: Monday, April 25, 2005 11:11 AM
> To: Bob Stayton
> Cc: ;
> Subject: [docbook-tc] Re: DocBook Technical Committee Meeting
> Minutes: 20 April 2005
>
>
> / "Bob Stayton" <> was heard to say:
> | 8. DocBook namespaces.
> |
> | A DocBook namespace is needed for version 5. We want a stable,
> | nonchanging name. The Committee agreed that it would apply to the
> | family of DocBook schemas, including Simplified DocBook and
> | customizations. The name would not contain a version number.
> |
> | The OASIS naming rules are not yet adopted, so Norm proposed using
> | "http://docbook.org/ns/docbook" as the namespace name.
> There is some
> | precedent for using a non-OASIS URI.
>
> I recall calling the question:
>
> Shall we adopt "http://docbook.org/ns/docbook" as the namespace name
> for DocBook V5.0
>
> and obtaining uninimous consent, but that is not clearly
> reflected in these minutes. Bob, could you please make a note
> for next month's agenda that when we adopt these minutes, we
> mean to adopt them as amended above. (If, in fact, the
> committee as a whole shares my personal recollection.)
>
> Be seeing you,
> norm
>
> --
> Norman Walsh <> | Everything should be made as
> http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | simple as possible, but
> no simpler. Chair, DocBook Technical Committee |
>
