Re: [docbook-tc] Re: XInclude support in DocBook NG

Norman Walsh wrote:

> I took a look. It was considerably harder than I had hoped. Part of
> the problem is that the patterns for sections were all wrong and fixing
> those made these even more complex.
> 
> And factoring in the fact that refentry is optional and has an impact
> on these patterns meant that I had to invent a ctrl:conditional
> operation for the build process.

Many thanks.

> I'll have a new release shortly that may (or may not) have gotten all
> this right.
> 
> I'm still uncertain whether it's worth the effort.

And what about having two schemas -- one pure without XIncludes (that 
will be official TC output) and one unoffical augmented with XInclude as 
convenience for people who need to have xi:include in the schema?

I'm also not convinced that offical schema should have XInclude inside. 
OTOH I'm pretty sure that people will ask for it.


					Jirka

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------
   Jirka Kosek     e-mail:      http://www.kosek.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------
   Profesionální školení a poradenství v oblasti technologií XML.
      Podívejte se na náš nově spuštěný web http://DocBook.cz
        Podrobný přehled školení http://xmlguru.cz/skoleni/
------------------------------------------------------------------