/ Scott Hudson <> was heard to say:
| I've been dealing with a number of clients that are considering DocBook
| implementations. One of the key requirements is consistently in the area of
| Digital Rights.
"Information wants to be free."
| Do you think it appropriate to include some digital rights elements into the
| info element, perhaps even from another vocabulary, such as ODRL (http://
| odrl.net/)?
|
| I'm talking about more than just the legalnotice. I think we need more
| specifics around permissions, constraints, requirements, and conditions.
|
| Thoughts?
DRM is evil.[1]
That said, I think it would be best to bring a concrete proposal to
the table. I took a quick look at the ODRL 1.1 "specification", which
is really just a W3C note.
I couldn't immediately grok the vocabulary there described, but
assuming that there is something that we could point to, a proposal of
the form "let's allow elements from the XXX namespace in info
elements" seems like it might be the easiest answer.
Be seeing you,
norm
[1] http://norman.walsh.name/2005/07/08/drm
--
Norman Walsh <> | I'm not tense, I'm just terribly,
http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | terribly alert.
Chair, DocBook Technical Committee |
