Re: [docbook-tc] Re: DocBook Technical Committee Meeting Minutes: 16 January 2008

On 27/01/2008, Norman Walsh <> wrote:
> / Keith Fahlgren <> was heard to say:

> |> If your real concern is the amount of markup, I think I'd be inclined to
> |> follow Keith's lead and invent your own local customization. Then translate
> |> that into "proper" revisionflag markup.

 Yes that would be the more appropriate approach.

> |
> | Additionally, I'd be delighted to figure out how in the world people are going
> | to have this markup created given a.xml b.xml. Is there anything other than
> | DeltaXML[1]?


Not the use case I quoted.

My use case was manual markup, hence the need for minimal verbosity.

regards


-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk