On 22 February 2010 17:25, Bob Stayton <> wrote:
> I'm following up on my action item from the last DocBook TC. We agreed that
> <info> would be used in assembly elements to document the assembly element
> that contains the info, which follows the current usage of info in DocBook.
> We agreed that any override information that would be used when a resource
> is used in a module when it is assembled should be in another container
> element within module.
This sentence shows the level of complexity here.
We need to decide on the name of that container now.
> The three suggestions from the meeting were:
> 4. info-merge, to indicate this info is applied when topics are merged into
> a document.
>
>
> I'll make one observation on naming style: currently DocBook has no elements
> with hyphens in the name. There is certainly no rule against it, but I
> thought I would point out that fact.
5. info-merge, since that is the desired effect? To merge this with other info
elements? I too dislike the hyphen. Is infomerge too complex? Or is that
too far from info?
I'm against Larrys supplement simply on grounds of length.
regards
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
Docbook FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
