RE: [docbook-tc] assembly metadata container

I like the supplement wrapper element.  It opens things up to provide things other than info if that becomes desirable.  I have a preference for supplement because I think that is what it is and, without becoming too much like the White Knight about it, I favor using as accurate a name as possible.

Regards,
Larry

-----Original Message-----
From: Norman Walsh [mailto:] 
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 11:28 AM
To: 
Subject: Re: [docbook-tc] assembly metadata container

Dave Pawson <> writes:
> 5. info-merge, since that is the desired effect? To merge this with other info
> elements? I too dislike the hyphen. Is infomerge too complex? Or is that
> too far from info?
>
> I'm against Larrys supplement simply on grounds of length.

Given that we have "programlistingco" and "inlinemediaobject", I'm
not to fussed about the length. I'd support either:

  infomerge

or

  infosupplement

We could also use merge or supplement as a top-level element name:

  <merge>
    <info>...</info>
  </merge>

  <supplement>
    <info>...</info>
  </supplement>

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <>      | Whatever else we are intended to
http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | do, we are not intended to
Chair, DocBook Technical Committee | succeed: failure is the fate
                                   | allotted.--Robert Louis Stevenson