OK, I filed the RFE. I don't think informaltable is allowed, as there is a schematron
rule against it, but not against table.
Bob Stayton
Sagehill Enterprises
----- Original Message -----
From: "Norman Walsh" <>
To: <>
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 10:32 AM
Subject: Re: [docbook-tc] Fw: informaltable inside table
"Bob Stayton" <> writes:
> This message raised an issue that I'm not understanding. It appears
> that the Cals table <entry> element in DocBook 5 does indeed permit
> <table>, but not <informaltable>. I don't remember allowing <table>
> inside <entry>, so I'm wondering if this is a bug?
It's a bug. And informaltable is allowed too. Drat.
