[Resending through working SMTP server...]
Jirka Kosek wrote:
> Thanks for very useful insight. I will try to digest all input in next
> draft.
Hi folks,
please find attached next draft of tranclusion proposal. I tried to
address all issues that have arisen during call and in email
communications. Instead of providing some formal definition I have
focused on providing examples -- I think that from them it is easier to
see how this is supposed to work. Once we are sure about how
transclusions should behave I can prepare more formal definition
appropriate for TDG.
I think that proposal is now quite developed regarding this "duplicate
ID" issue. However as I don't have personal experience with sort of
manual solution to problem using prefixes I would especially ask Larry
if he can check whether proposal is addressing everything he had in mind.
I'm also attaching sample files and very sketchy XSLT 2.0 based
transclusion implementation if anyone is interested.
I would like to start discussion now on email, so we can develop
proposal way further before next telcon.
Thanks and have a nice day,
Jirka
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
Jirka Kosek e-mail: http://xmlguru.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------
Professional XML consulting and training services
DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing
------------------------------------------------------------------
OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 member
------------------------------------------------------------------
