On 8 February 2011 17:56, Jirka Kosek <> wrote:
> Dave Pawson wrote: > >> And still won't let the un-enlightened user know? >> >> Nothing in the validation says 'this is docbook and you're using >> dbpubs', or vice versa? >
> Dave, maybe you should describe use case for this. For what it is good for? >
> If some one has document which is instance of "publishers" then either
> this is also valid DocBook (if no additional publishers elements are
> used) or it is only valid against publishers schema because some
> publisher specific elements are used. So Mr ignorant creates an instance of the latter. Takes a liking to using dc:author for instance. Tries to validate against docbook and receives this funny error (which says nothing about version, or dbpubs....) What is he to make of that error? If some part of the processing reported that 'hey, this instance is dbpubs, you're using docbook' then he might be wiser.
HTH
--
Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
