Dave Pawson wrote:
> I've always expected the version to be numeric Scott? That was never case with DocBook 5. See
http://www.docbook.org/docs/howto/#cust-naming
http://www.docbook.org/tdg5/en/html/ch05.html#s-notdocbook
> For which TDG is clear. "Don't call it docbook"
> Bit late now, but renaming the document element
> to x-pubs, where x is book/article/... perhaps? Why to rename root element, it doesn't make sense.
> Or simpler, just give it a clear / different name,
> then use docbook ns etc? I think it is enough to call it DocBook Publishers or something like that and add version="5.0-variant publishers-1.0" to root element. (variant is better then extension, because some elements were removed) Jirka --
------------------------------------------------------------------
Jirka Kosek
e-mail:
http://xmlguru.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------
Professional XML consulting and training services
DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing
------------------------------------------------------------------
OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 member
------------------------------------------------------------------
OpenPGP digital signature
