On 25 October 2011 21:27, Jirka Kosek <> wrote:
> On 25.10.2011 18:53, Hudson, Scott wrote:
>
>> OR should we put the version number at the beginning:
>>
>> db-5.1-publishers-beta-01
>> db-5.1-assembly-beta-01
>> db-5.1-xinc-beta-01
>> db-5.1-core-beta-01
>
> I think that naming schema similar to this would be less confusing and
> it will better express that those customizations are on top of DocBook V5.1.
+1. It reads very clearly.
>
> I'm in favor of change in this direction. One question is still
> remaining -- what we will put into version attribute? Will we change
> pattern for version attribute or we will stick with the current state of
> affairs?
IMHO that is largely for the machine? Hence db-5.1.01 would/should suffice?
HTH
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
Docbook FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
