Re: First attempt at DocBook V5.1-CSPRD01

From
Chet Ensign <>
Date
2014-12-11T12:17:35+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: First attempt at DocBook V5.1-CSPRD01
Yes, yes, yes. I assure you that there are more than a few folks here who'll be happy to snark along. 

However, I have to administer the rules as written and the TC Process does indeed require editable source, HTML and PDF for all published work products. 

On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Norman Walsh <> wrote:Chet Ensign <> writes:

> 2) In addition to the HTML document, we need a copy of the editable source and a

> PDF. 

A PDF is *required*? <snark offense="not intended">You have heard of

this thing called the web, right?</snark>

                                        Be seeing you,

                                          norm

--

Norman Walsh <> | So, are you working on finding that bug

http://nwalsh.com/            | now, or are you leaving it until later?

                              | Yes.

-- 

/chet   [§] 
----------------
Chet Ensign
Director of Standards Development and TC Administration 
OASIS: Advancing open standards for the information society
http://www.oasis-open.org

Primary: +1 973-996-2298
Mobile: +1 201-341-1393 

Check your work using the Support Request Submission Checklist at http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/47248/tc-admin-submission-checklist.html 

TC Administration information and support is available at http://www.oasis-open.org/resources/tcadmin

Follow OASIS on:
LinkedIn:    http://linkd.in/OASISopen
Twitter:        http://twitter.com/OASISopen
Facebook:  http://facebook.com/oasis.open