Norman Walsh <> writes:
> On another front, the publishers 1.1 schema appears to have been
> checked into the 5.1 branch, but not master. So the version in the 5.2
> branch is 1.0 not 1.1. Iâm in the process of bringing the publishers
> version in the 5.2-dev branch up to 1.1+.
Sorry. I was confused. Apparently it *was* in master, but not in 5.1.
> I propose also that we publish a 1.2b of Publishers thatâs based off
> of 5.2 DocBook schema. Mostly this involves marking new elements as
> ânot allowedâ (buildtarget, legalsection, etc.)
Apparently admonitions were forbidden from publishers 1.0 but allowed
in 1.1, so Iâm leaveing danger in 1.2.
> Does the TC have a sense of whether or not âformalgroupâ should be in
> Publishers?
Iâm leaving this in as well, for the moment.
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh <> | Hanging is too good for a man who makes
http://nwalsh.com/ | puns; he should be drawn and
| quoted.--Fred Allen
