I said:
> I think the confusion is here. It's not clear from the DTD that the
> first one is the class identication and the others are base classes
Norman Walsh writes:
> But if we make that expectation clear, does it leave any
> processing problems unresolvable?
I think it's important that the markup make it clear to someone
looking at it (rather than the result of processing it) that one of
those *name elements names "this" class (or whatever it happens to
be), and the others fall into the "related" category. What is the
best way to do this, I don't rightly know. My examples were only
intended as stabs in the dark; you do rightly raise valid concerns
about them.
-Fred
--
Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdrake at acm.org>
Corporation for National Research Initiatives
