Next in thread → Next in month →

Re: DOCBOOK: No <co> in <userinput> ?

From
Nik Clayton <>
Date
2000-07-18T17:10:53+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: DOCBOOK: No <co> in <userinput> ?
On Sun, Jul 02, 2000 at 05:24:51PM -0400, Norman Walsh wrote:
> / Nik Clayton <> was heard to say:
> | Is there any reason why <co> (callout) is allowed in <screen> but 
> | disallowed in <userinput>?  I'd have thought being able to mark parts
> | of a user's command line to refer back to in discussion would be a useful
> | facility.
> 
> I don't think we ever considred someone wanting to put CO inside an
> inline.  It doesn't seem unreasonable to me. File an RFE and we'll
> discuss it at the next meeting.

Done.  Incidentally, do you think it would be worthwhile having new
RFEs automatically posted here for further discussion?

N
-- 
Internet connection, $19.95 a month.  Computer, $799.95.  Modem, $149.95.
Telephone line, $24.95 a month.  Software, free.  USENET transmission,
hundreds if not thousands of dollars.  Thinking before posting, priceless.
Somethings in life you can't buy.  For everything else, there's MasterCard.
  -- Graham Reed, in the Scary Devil Monastery
Next in thread → Next in month →