Norm,
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=456174&group_id=21935&atid=384107
When you ask a question here like this, do you want followups to go
to the list? Or to the SourceForge bug? I am just sending this to the
list, but will add it to SF if that is where you want it.
> Yann Dirson suggests that a yearrange element be added to copyright.
>
> The TC considered this and admitted to a certain amount of fudging in
> practice, using <year>1999-2001</year>. This is less than ideal, but
> what have other people elected to do when faced with this problem?
I have done exactly what you mention: <year>1999-2001</year>
I suppose something like:
<yearrange>
<year>1999</year>
<year>2001</year>
</yearrange>
might be more elegant from an XML point of view, but I personally
have not had an issue with doing it the way mentioned above.
My 2 cents (Canadian),
Dan
--
Dan York, Director of Training
Ph: +1-613-751-4401 Cell: +1-613-263-4312 Fax: +1-613-564-7739
Mitel Network Corporation Network Server Solutions Group
150 Metcalfe St., Suite 1500, Ottawa,ON K2P 1P1 Canada
http://www.e-smith.com/ http://www.mitel.com/
