At 10:24 AM +0000 6/5/02, Matt G. wrote:
>>1. Is "packagename" the right name for symmetry with classname and
>>interfacename or should this be simply "package"? Or perhapps
>>"oopackage" for symmetry with ooclass and oointerface?
>
>Personally, I fail to see why 'package' wouldn't work just as well.
>Unless 'package' is desired as a structural element, there would be
>no meaningful distinction between using 'package' and 'packagename',
>for an inline element.
>
>
To me, a "package" is something that contains classes, whereas the
proposed "packagename" element would only contain PCDATA. But this is
a minor issue, so either way works for me.
--
+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
| Elliotte Rusty Harold | | Writer/Programmer |
+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
| The XML Bible, 2nd Edition (Hungry Minds, 2001) |
| http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/bible2/ |
| http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0764547607/cafeaulaitA/ |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
| Read Cafe au Lait for Java News: http://www.cafeaulait.org/ |
| Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.cafeconleche.org/ |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
