At 11:31 31/05/2003 -0400, ed nixon wrote:
>For example, what about a mapping of DocBook elements to XHTML elements?
>As a first approximation of a "core" set? It would likely be many-to-one
>in most cases. DocBook is richer with respect to XHTML, but that DocBook
>subset, call it a *new* SDocBook might be a good starting point to look at
>modularization with respect to other, more specific, more rich
>requirements for other forms of technical documentation.
And quite possibly it would meet the needs of ??? 70% of docbook users?
I.e. all those who mark up in docbook and present in (X)HTML?
regards DaveP
