At 10:49 13/05/2003 +0200, Yann Dirson wrote:
> > DocBook ideally should not have any presentational features, I agree.
> > But you can simply limit yourself to the non-presentational, semantical
> > and structural subset.
> > (I'd prefer if the presentational features would be excluded, but many
> > would disagree.)
>
>That's why I tried to propose a "balanced exclusion" :)
'tables/cigarettes are bad for your health", type of warnings :-)
Tobias has a point which we have argued over before.
For fast information absorption, tables are fine for the sighted.
regards DaveP.
