← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →

Re: Encoding programming statements

From
Norman Walsh <>
Date
2003-07-18T01:26:13+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: Encoding programming statements
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

/ BigSmoke <> was heard to say:
| What is 'the right way' to encode a programming statement. For example:
|
| <para>
|   Both the <unknown>return</unknown> and <unknown>if</unknown>
|   statement are impossible to mark-up properly if you can't find suitable
|   elements in the TDG.
| </para>

This depends a little bit on the context of your document. In addition to
Michael's solution, I can imagine using "token", "literal", or "nonterminal"
in various kinds of documents.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

- -- 
Norman Walsh <>      | Almost every man wastes part of
http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | his life in attempts to display
Chair, DocBook Technical Committee | qualities which he does not
                                   | possess, and to gain applause
                                   | which he cannot keep.--Dr. Johnson
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.7 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>

iD8DBQE/FyX0OyltUcwYWjsRAnVUAKCHcPsAAAi5EMha7YqsxVsgfoFXFgCdGr5g
SWP9iXcXf882okM6iuSEssM=
=eGdW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →