Re: [docbook] Re: DocBook Annotations

From
Dave Pawson <>
Date
2005-02-16T19:30:25+00:00
ID
1108582221.6362.13.camel@marge
Thread
Re: [docbook] Re: DocBook Annotations
On Tue, 2005-02-15 at 15:56 -0500, Norman Walsh wrote:
> / "Bob Stayton" <> was heard to say:
> | I was also wondering that the content models of the two annotation elements
> | would be.
> 

> alt = text | db.inlinemediaobject
> 
> (Maybe we should allow the ubiq. inlines in there, maybe we shouldn't.)

If the content model gets complex, surely the annotation element might
be more use?
I like the simpler one, just text | db.inlinemediaobject

regards DaveP