On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 04:49:50PM +0200,
Paul Libbrecht <> wrote
a message of 66 lines which said:
> In your example, I see no definition of "recursive types", e.g. using
> records or lists with documentation on the type of contained objects.
> Is it planned ?
Yes, it would be a good idea, I'll try.
> the encoding that I can read there:
> return-type <function>funcName</function>
> and <parameter> paramName </parameter> param-type
>
> sounds a bit weird to me. Is this the holy way in DocBook ?
I'm afraid so.
