On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 20:16:24 +0900, Michael Smith <>
wrote:
> I just looked at the doc for the Area element, and I would guess
> from reading it that it was written without any thought at all put
> toward the whether the referenced image has a viewport.
>
> Anyway, it seems to me it would make the most sense for the
> calspair percentages to be based on the actual rendered size of
> the image-- not the size of any viewport it might be shown in and
> not the intrinsic size of the image.
Yes, it makes sense to use the image size instead of the viewport. Maybe
it could be interesting to tell something about this in the TDG. What do
you think?
Regards,
BG
