> When CSS gets implemented
like, say
Prince
http://www.princexml.com/
CSSToXSLFO
http://www.re.be/css2xslfo/
Flying Saucer
https://xhtmlrenderer.dev.java.net/
KHTML 3.4
http://www.konqueror.org/css/
Opera 8
http://www.opera.com/docs/specs/#css
Mozilla
http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/CSS
XXE
http://www.xmlmind.com/xmleditor/features.html
XMetaL
http://www.xmetal.com/en_us/products/xmetal_author/customized_user_interfaces.x
> When CSS is accepted
like, say
Open eBook
http://www.openebook.org/oebps/oebps1.2/download/oeb12-xhtml.htm#sec1.3.4
OpenReader
http://www.openreader.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=72&Itemid=157
Microsoft Reader Authoring Guides, Markup Guide
http://www.microsoft.com/reader/developers/downloads/markup.asp
Standards and CSS in IE
http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2005/07/29/445242.aspx
Web Content Accessibility
http://usability.gov/accessibility/
http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/
http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20-CSS-TECHS/
Styling SVG with CSS
http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/styling.html#StylingWithCSS
XHTML 2.0 user agent rendering behaviour specified using CSS2
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/xhtml2-style.html#a_stylesheet
Linking behaviour described in terms of CSS
http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-hyperlinks/
> It still won't have 10% of the capability of XSLT.
To the best of my knowledge, XSLT does not actually render anything. Using XSLT to transform XML into Netscape 4.7-compatible tag soup HTML is -- at best -- a wasted effort.
An old article with a conclusion that still holds true
What Place Has CSS in the XML World?
http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2000/03/08/style/
Kind regards
Peter Ring
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Pawson [mailto:]
> Sent: 7. november 2005 19:21
> To: Steven T. Hatton
> Cc:
> Subject: Re: [docbook] Whatever happened too CSS+XML?
>
>
> On Sun, 2005-11-06 at 17:05 -0500, Steven T. Hatton wrote:
> > A few years back I was looking at this stuff, and never
> understood why people
> > weren't more interested in it. Basically, you should be
> able to server a
> > DocBook document on the web without every creating XHTML.
> When I consider
> > the effort that has been put into creating XSLT stylesheets
> to generate
> > XHTML, it seems the same amount of effort (or considerably
> less) could
> > produce XML + CSS that would have as much functionality as
> any XHTML produced
> > from the DocBook XML.
>
> Rubbish.
> When CSS gets implemented
> When CSS is accepted
> It still won't have 10% of the capability of XSLT.
>
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Dave Pawson
> XSLT + Docbook FAQ
> http://www.dpawson.co.uk
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> For additional commands, e-mail:
>
>
