← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →
Re: [docbook] DocBook Technical Committee Meeting Minutes: 17 May2006
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Norman Walsh a 嶰rit : [...] > | 8. Resolve ourselves against the new OASIS IPR policy. > | See http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/chairs/200602/msg00038.html > | Continued from previous meeting. > > There are three IPR modes: > > - RAND > - RF on RAND > - RF on Limited Terms > > Norm summarizes the state of play and suggests that RF on Limited > Terms is our best option. RAND didn't win any support. > > No one objects to RF on Limited Terms as a proposal. > > We must adopt the new terms by April 2007. > > The open question is, are we comfortable with RF on Limited Terms? > > Nancy suggests that it isn't ideal, it isn't as open as we might like, > but it's much better than ending the TC (our only other choice). Why is it so bad to end the TC? (or more precisely to leave OASIS as I understand it) Also, I might have misinterpreted the terms of the various IPR modes, could someone explain us, foreigners that haven't got a Harvard degree, in clear terms, what those modes mean for users? (perhaps mainly the RF on Limited Terms) Thanks, Camille. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEbXU8jv9P65BfOUMRApVAAJoCDCKgI4g48gjKp22ei+4bIMEd4wCePY+C kkaIpEo1bdl5nRPV8ySbPeo= =JO2x -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →