← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →

Re: [docbook] DocBook Technical Committee Meeting Minutes: 17 May2006

From
=?JRN-8859-1?P?Damille_C=F9gnis?=
Date
2006-05-19T07:35:13+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [docbook] DocBook Technical Committee Meeting Minutes: 17 May2006
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Norman Walsh a 嶰rit :

[...]

> | 8.  Resolve ourselves against the new OASIS IPR policy.
> |    See http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/chairs/200602/msg00038.html
> |    Continued from previous meeting.
> 
> There are three IPR modes:
> 
> - RAND
> - RF on RAND
> - RF on Limited Terms
> 
> Norm summarizes the state of play and suggests that RF on Limited
> Terms is our best option. RAND didn't win any support.
> 
> No one objects to RF on Limited Terms as a proposal.
> 
> We must adopt the new terms by April 2007.
> 
> The open question is, are we comfortable with RF on Limited Terms?
> 
> Nancy suggests that it isn't ideal, it isn't as open as we might like,
> but it's much better than ending the TC (our only other choice).

Why is it so bad to end the TC? (or more precisely to leave OASIS as I
understand it)

Also, I might have misinterpreted the terms of the various IPR modes,
could someone explain us, foreigners that haven't got a Harvard degree,
 in clear terms, what those modes mean for users? (perhaps mainly the RF
on Limited Terms)

Thanks,

Camille.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFEbXU8jv9P65BfOUMRApVAAJoCDCKgI4g48gjKp22ei+4bIMEd4wCePY+C
kkaIpEo1bdl5nRPV8ySbPeo=
=JO2x
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →