Norman Walsh <>, 2006-10-26 08:59 -0400:
> As a slight extension of this model, we could also add a <tasktopic>
> element. This would address the feature request[1] for "task" as a
> peer to "section". If we did this, then I'd expect "topic" or
> "tasktopic" to be allowed anywhere I've mentioned topic above.
What content model would Tasktopic have?
And "tasktopic" ain't a pretty name. What about naming it
"process" or "operation" instead? (Yeah I know those stink too,
but they stink less than "tasktopic".)
--Mike
--
Michael(tm) Smith
xmpp:
irc://irc.freenode.net/mobile-web
