Norman Walsh wrote:
> * A point release (X.1,X.2,X.1.2, etc.) MUST NOT contain any backwards
> incompatible changes.
>
> * A major release MAY contain backwards incompatible changes if both
> of the following conditions are true:
>
> - The change was announced in the release notes for the previous
> version (major or minor)
>
> - The change was announced in a release that occurred at least six
> months previously.
That looks good, I suggest we add a condition that is to provide along
with the backwards incompatible release a stylesheet able to convert
legacy documents to newer schema.
I know it might be delicate in some cases, but that could be a start for
anyone.
Cheers,
Camille.
