Re: [docbook] docbook definition still based on DTD?

On Thu, 7 Jan 2010, Jirka Kosek wrote:

> Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >   perhaps a silly question, but at the moment (as i read it), the
> > definition of docbook is generally presented as the official DTD.
> > however, there is also a schema for docbook and, given that schemas
> > can represent things non-representable in simple DTDs, will there be
> > a point where docbook (5.0?) can no longer be represented by a simple
> > DTD?  or has that already happened?
>
> Please see the following comparison:
>
> http://www.docbook.org/docs/howto/#introduction-schemas

  thanks, that's exactly what i was after.

rday
--

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                               Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA

            Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry.

Web page:                                          http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
========================================================================