On 04/06/2010 09:24 AM, Dave Pawson wrote:
>
> IMHO website and slides are 'different' from, say, a poetry extension
> or a PHP or C++ specific extension?
> the latter add elements|attributes, perhaps remove some, i.e.
> customize the tagset. Website and slides may do so in a little way,
> but it is largely in the transformation to an output format that
> the work lies?
>
Sure, the main concern of Website and Slides is the stylesheets.
However, there are some vocabulary extensions, and it would certainly be
a good idea to make sure that users will be able to write DB slides that
contain API markup, i.e. have multiple such profiles be used in the same
document.
Your original comment was different, though, as you seemed to suggest
that the *existing* vocabulary may be partitioned. Right ?
Thanks,
Stefan
--
...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...
