As Bob Stayton has just been kind enough to point out I've managed to make no sense here.
Please read this as:
I've just been looking at some XML coming in from a typesetter and noticed some misuse of <extendedlink> elements. Looking at what they were trying to do led me to suspect they should have been using a simple <link> element. Of course, these aren't allowed within bibliomixed elements.
So, is there a particular reason why <extendedlink> is allowed within <bibliomixed> when <link> isn't?
yours in a vaguely embarrassed manner
nic
On 3 Jun 2011, at 09:42, Nic Gibson wrote:
I've just been looking at some XML coming in from a typesetter and noticed some misuse of <extendedlink> elements. Looking at what they were trying to do led me to suspect they should have been using a simple <link> element. Of course, these aren't allowed within bibliomisc elements.
So, is there a particular reason why <extendedlink> is allowed within <bibliomisc> when <link> isn't?
cheers
nic
--
Nic Gibson
Corbas Consulting
Digital Publishing Consultancy and Training
http://www.corbas.co.uk, +44 (0)7718 906817
--
Nic Gibson
Corbas Consulting
Digital Publishing Consultancy and Training
http://www.corbas.co.uk, +44 (0)7718 906817
