Re: Letting components be empty

"Bob Stayton" <> writes:
> The part before the "|" has to have something, but the part after does
> not.  Does that relieve the ambiguity?  And this could be expressed in
> DTD syntax as well, no?

No, I don't think that quite works, as Jirka pointed out. But with enough work,
maybe one can be constructed. I'll give it some thought.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <>      | No victor believes in chance.--
http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | Nietzsche
Chair, DocBook Technical Committee |