Re: [docbook] Inclusion of fragments

On 18/06/12 11:10, Lech Rzedzicki wrote:
> You're probably after Docbook Transclusions [1]
> [1]http://docbook.org/docs/transclusion/

Indeed I am...I knew there would be something I had missed.

For the moment, a simple kludge in XSLT2 suffices -- all I needed for
this application was basically a modified CONREF -- but the transclusion
problem won't go away.

///Peter