Is it the intention of this group to continue DSML down an
LDAP-centric model, or to consider other directory ideas?
And what about other technologies like SAML, SOAP, etc...?
Or is this spelled out in a charter somewhere, and I'm just
being out-of-place and rude?
-andy
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 02:29:06PM -0700, Tony Gullotta wrote:
> We've seen a few proposals from different groups for DSML 2.0 lately.
> Microsoft's was the most recent. What are the next steps for getting a
> consensus on a direction to take?
>
> Our group had sent in one, but I would much rather reach a compromise
> with someone else's approach at this point to get the standard in place
> instead of having a stand-off. Microsoft's was similar enough to ours in
> principal that I think we could work with that one. Does anyone else
> strongly favor or strongly apose any of these recommendations?
>
> Tony Gullotta
> Chief Software Architect
> www.access360.com
>
> access360
> A Better Way to Manage Access Rights
>
>
--
Andrew Newton
VeriSign Applied Research
