Dear Juan Carlos,
I have not read any comments on this profile...
Anyway, if this first consolidated version of the requirements document has to include just functional requirements, we could produce it. In fact, it's a quite simple profile from a functional point of view...
But if it has also to include some technical requirements I would very much appreciate some comments, especially about which signature format seems to be more suitable for the signature which has to be produced and included in a <ResponseSignature> element.
Or maybe, does this kind of technical requirements have to be discussed while working on the profile itself? I'm sorry, but I'm not familiar with the procedure :-)
Thanks and regards,
Marta
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Juan Carlos Cruellas [mailto:]
Enviado el: viernes, 02 de noviembre de 2007 18:06
Para: ; Marta Cruellas
Asunto: [dss-x] Your views on Signed Verification Response profile requirements document
Dear Marta,
At the last conf call, we were uncertain on the current status of the
work on requirements for the Signed Verification Response Profile. WOuld
you say that if you do not receive additional comments before the next
meeting it could be possible to produce a first consolidated version of
the requirements document and start working on the profile itself?
Regards and thanks
Juan Carlos.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS
at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
