RE: [ebcore] Comments on the brochure

Dale,

Yes - I was confused!

Talk to you at 10 PST. 

 

Thanks, DW

-------- Original Message --------

Subject: RE: [ebcore] Comments on the brochure

From: "Moberg Dale" <>

Date: Fri, June 12, 2009 11:44 am

To: "David RR Webber (XML)" <>, "Pim van der Eijk"

<>

Cc: <>

            
 
We have not had the call yet. It should be scheduled for 10 AM Pacific, right? I have 8:44 here.
 
 
 
 
  
 
From: David RR Webber (XML) [mailto:] 
 Sent: Friday, June 12, 2009 8:30 AM
 To: Pim van der Eijk
 Cc: 
 Subject: RE: [ebcore] Comments on the brochure
 
 
 
 
 
Pim,
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Just missed the call - office distractions - you just step away for a minute... - called in at 15 past but looks like we had a short meeting.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Anyway - see my comments to your notes below. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Thanks, DW
 
  
 
-------- Original Message --------
 Subject: [ebcore] Comments on the brochure
 From: "Pim van der Eijk" <>
 Date: Fri, June 12, 2009 11:10 am
 To: <>
 
Here is some feedback on the brochure:
 
 
 
Page 3, item 1: "The most cost effective" can we substantiate the claim that ebXML is more cost-effective than other B2B protocols? 
 
 
 
>>> This is compared to WS* solution stacks - and the fact that ebXML is tailored for B2B and hence does not carry overhead of these other approaches - plus implementing ebXML on limited resources is a proven quantity - and you can fit capability to requirements - again you are not buyng more than you need. <<<
 
 
 
Page 3, item 6: "Available as stable and proven open source solutions"
 
Suggest to replace this by:
 
"Available as stable and proven solutions, both in commercial and open source products"
 
 
 
>>> OK
 
 
 
Page 3, item 6:  reference to backwards compatibility, note that ebMS 3.0 is not wire protocol compatible with 2.0. 
 
 
 
>>> Right - but features in 2.0 will still work on 3.0 - that's what people want - not having to recode entirely.  How about saying "Feature compatibility is carried forward ... - rather than "Backward compatibility is built-in ... ?
 
 
 
Page 4:
 
Holland: replace this specific example by the more general: "Large scale message exchange among justice, police, child protection and juvenile care organizations".
 
 
 
>>> OK
 
 
 
Pim
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
From: David RR Webber (XML) [mailto:] 
 Sent: 11 June 2009 16:02
 To: Moberg Dale
 Cc: ; 
 Subject: RE: [ebcore] Agenda - call tomorrow June 12?
 
 
Dale,
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Yes - we'd like to complete the brochure!
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
I'm available Friday for the call in. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Thanks, DW
 
  
 
-------- Original Message --------
 Subject: RE: [ebcore] Agenda - call tomorrow June 12?
 From: "Moberg Dale" <>
 Date: Thu, June 11, 2009 9:04 am
 To: <>, <>
 
 
 
I can chair and I agree that David’s brochure is the main open issue at present.
 
  
 
  
 
 
From:  [mailto:] 
 Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 3:27 AM
 To: 
 Subject: [ebcore] Agenda - call tomorrow June 12?
 
 
 
 
Team, 
 
 
 
        do we have any agenda items for the scheduled call tomorrow (June 12)?  Can Dale chair? (Kathryn is not available - see previous e-mails)  I have no items and unless David can join to finalise the brochure which we agreed to on a previous call should we cancel?
 
 
 
Regards, 
 
 
 
Ian
 
 
 
   
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php 
 
  
   --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php