Tony:
I
don't remember if multiparty collaboration is already included in the agenda for
CPP/A 3.0, but it occurs to me that BTP cohesions and atoms may involve any
number of participants.
Does
the support of BTP in CPP/A 3.0 imply that multiparty collaboration must
also be supported?
Also,
will it be necessary to extend BPSS to describe the cohesion/atom behavor of
collaborations? For example, will a multiparty collaboration have to
identify the minimal subset of participants that must succeed before the
cohesion can be considered successful? Does the OASIS BTP team have any
plan to liaise with the ebtwg-bps team?
Thanks,
-Arvola
-----Original Message-----
From:
Tony Fletcher [mailto:]
Sent: Tuesday,
May 14, 2002 12:52 PM
To: ebXML CPP/A BTP List
Subject:
[ebxml-cppa-btp] Proposed requirements on CPP/A for BTP
Dear Colleagues,
I think this is
the first mailing to this list for quite sometime - I hope it will not be the
last and that we will be able to have a little discussion ahead of the June
F2F and continue afterwards as we work towards a specification of some
sort.
Please find
attached an updated version of my proposed set of requirements for extensions
to CPP/A to include BTP capable systems. I put it like that, because it
is our current contention that there is actually very little to configure in
BTP itself. It should all be driven off the role being played in the
particular business process (and ideally even that would imply we are doing
BTP or we are not!)
I am travelling
over the next few days so I may be a little slow at replying, but I will try
to reply to any responses - and I will certainly be reading posts to this list
with interest even if there is no need for me to respond.
Best Regards
Tony
A M Fletcher
Choreology Ltd., 13 Austin Friars, London
EC2N 2JX UK
Tel: +44 (0) 20
76701787 Mobile: +44 (0) 7801
948219
(Home: )
