Tony,
I'm posting this to the list since I am not sure it is strictly a minutes
fidelity matter.
In "Preliminary Discussion", you discuss "...steps in order for the ebXML
CPPA 1.0 specification to be moved over to OASIS". I had understood the
discussion to concern V 1.1 and future versions. Is it necessary to go
through an OASIS approval process for V 1.0? Are other teams doing this?
It seems to me that unless getting V 1.0 approved by OASIS is a
precondition to future versions, we should avoid the overhead of getting V
1.0 approved and save the energy for working on V 1.1. Of course, putting
an OASIS cover on it would allow us to claim that it is a standard rather
than a specification but if there is a significant cost in an approval
process, it may not be worth it.
Regards,
Marty
*************************************************************************************
Martin W. Sachs
IBM T. J. Watson Research Center
P. O. B. 704
Yorktown Hts, NY 10598
914-784-7287; IBM tie line 863-7287
Notes address: Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM
Internet address: mwsachs @ us.ibm.com
*************************************************************************************
Tony Weida <> on 08/23/2001 10:51:08 PM
To: "CPPA (E-mail)" <>
cc:
Subject: CPPA teleconference minutes: August 23, 2001
The minutes of today's teleconference are attached. Please advise me of
any
corrections or additions promptly. After tomorrow (Friday) afternoon, I'll
be on vacation for a week.
Cheers,
Tony
<<CPPA Call Minutes 23 August 2001.doc>>
