Title: RE: [ebxml-iic] RE: impl guidelines, on the "technical" and "depl oyment" sides
OK, Eric you are on the team for the "deployment template" design,
with Monica & Pete... (and Michael Wang of course as editor, in so far
as the outcome is still assumed to be a merged document.)
So I assume the subteam for now is:
(make sure to CC each other in this group, on this topic,
unless you send to ebxml-iic + EAN folks, which is perfectly OK):
Regards,
Jacques
-----Original Message-----
From: Eric VanLydegraf [mailto:]
Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 6:14 PM
To: 'Pete Wenzel'; Jacques Durand
Cc: ; '';
''; Federico Franciosi; Thomas Bikeev
Subject: RE: [ebxml-iic] RE: impl guidelines, on the "technical" and
"depl oyment" sides
I'd like to say the template idea is a really good one.
I found the EAN.UCC document had a very good outline and broke apart the
sections of MSH in a nice way, the parts where it stressed
compliance with recommended or optional portions of the ebMSG spec struck me
as "best practices" something we should consider inclusion of or at least
discussion to see if that's a good "best practices" or more specific to EAN
concerns. The more detailed portions were specific business application of
ebXML to EAN.UCC only - which I would consider is the details filled into
the template creating the EAN instance of the IIC standardized template doc.
M. Wang's document has very good specific implementation guidelines but
doesn't have the organization of tying the details to the more general
portions of the MSH.
So I propose a good 1st draft strategy is to consider the EAN outline with
the specific guidelines from M. Wang's document placed in the appropriate
MSH outline sections and to have something like a fill-in-the-box areas for
business recommendations or requirements for ebXML framework usuage in a
particular deployment. In this way you've got the pure technical details on
things like defaults and design approaches, best practices recommendations
and a placeholder for specific business requirements of a particular
deployment.
-----Original Message-----
From: Pete Wenzel [mailto:]
Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 12:40 PM
To: Jacques Durand
Cc: ; '';
''; Federico Franciosi; Thomas Bikeev
Subject: Re: [ebxml-iic] RE: impl guidelines, on the "technical" and
"deployment" sides
Thus spoke Jacques Durand () on Mon, Jun 17, 2002 at
12:21:11PM -0700:
> ...
> As for the "deployment" side of the guidelines, a cooperation path seems
> to emerge with EAN.UCC,
> where Federico and Bolivar (EAN), will work with Pete Wenzel
> (CycloneCommerce), on some
> "deployment" (or business customization?) template - whatever name they
> agree on - that should help
> user communities to achieve this layer of interoperability beyonf
> technical MSH interaction,
> but before payload business content (e.g. as specified by OAG or
> RosettaNet).
> EAN would provide a first instance of such template.
> Such template would also help in standardizing test cases for this
> layer.
My contact information is found below (please note correct company
affiliation). Monica Martin <> has also expressed
her interest in helping to develop and/or review such a template.
--Pete
Pete Wenzel <>
SeeBeyond
Standards & Product Strategy
+1-626-471-6311 (US-Pacific)
----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
