Kass 10/24/2002 [ebxml-iic]: Abstract Test Cases

Michael,
Grand job!
 
On req36, the requirement is to verify ConversationId is always present,
yet you test for verification a ConversationID is not present
(count()=0).
On req45, is the end of the abstract 'pseudo code' correct 'and /'?
On req74, wouldn't we be repeating steps until we hit the max retry
count as a loop? How is that represented or is it implicit in the
abstract?
 
Thanks, Michael.
Monica

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Kass [mailto:]
Sent: Sunday, October 20, 2002 9:29 PM
To: Jacques Durand; ''
Subject: Re: [ebxml-iic] Call this Monday 21, 10am PT


Jacques,

   Attached is the latest update to ebXML MS 2.0 Abstract Conformance
Test Suite document.
I have simplified the XPath syntax for easier reading and understanding.


   One suggestion that I have for improving further: 
     
    1) Change name of PreCondition and ConformanceCondition to
"TestPreCondition" and "TestConformanceCondition", since that will
align better with the "PutMessage" , "SetPayload", "GetMessage" and
"GetPayload" operation ( action ) names.
  
Regards,
Mike


At 06:41 PM 10/18/2002 -0700, Jacques Durand wrote:


All:
 
Call this week:
 
Host: SeeBeyond (will host the Oct 7, 14, 21, 28 conference calls. 
Dialing information is as follows: 
US Toll-Free:   866-628-8003 
International:  +1 630-424-4862 
Passcode:       8500499# 
 
General Agenda so far: 

1. Status on external initiatives and liaisons : 
(OAG/NIST, ECOM, CEN/ISSS, UeB Architecture Impl. guide) 
Joint Marketing Committee: Monica suggests we need a representative
there.

2. Deployment templates (Pete)
- current status, how we work with EAN on an instance.

3. test Case material and MS COnformance suite  (Mike, Matt)
- status on the test case definitions.

4. Interoperability Test suite (Steve / Hatem)
- points on the agenda of sub-team f-2-f end of week.
 
 
Regards,
 
Jacques